04.11.2025

  • Country’s ability to remain mass crop exporter is at risk as fertiliser use falls and soils degrade 

  • Experts recommend efficient farming methods to maintain productivity and protect environment 

Beyond the disruption to Ukraine’s food exports, the war is jeopardising the country’s long-term ability to remain the ‘breadbasket of Europe’, because its soils are gradually losing vital crop nutrients. 

That is the warning issued by researchers from the UK, Ukraine and the Netherlands who say more nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium* are now being removed from soils via harvested crops than added back in. This is due to reduced access to fertilisers during the war and inefficient farming practices. Military activity has also exacerbated existing degradation and erosion of soils across Ukraine. 

The new study, led by the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH), has been published in the Nature journal Communications Earth & Environment.  

It recommends better farm management of nutrients, such as taking advantage of animal manure as an organic fertiliser for croplands, more efficient use and application of fertilisers, and introducing legumes into crop rotations.  

This would benefit soil health, food production and the environment. Surplus nutrients from fertilisers degrade soil health and leach into water, which can result in toxic algal blooms, while excess nitrogen additionally also contributes to air pollution and greenhouse gas emissions.** 

Integrated nutrient management 

Dr Sergiy Medinets of UKCEH, who led the study, said: “Unless action is taken to restore lost nutrients in soils, there is likely to be a long-term impact on crop production in Ukraine. This would not only affect food security in Ukraine but also globally – particularly North Africa and the Middle East which depend upon imports – and further push up prices and increase hunger. 

“There is therefore an urgent need for an integrated nutrient management plan for Ukraine that wastes fewer nutrients and reduces the amount of synthetic fertiliser needed.” 

Dr Medinets explained this plan would involve more efficient use and precise application of synthetic and organic fertilisers. It would also include expanding the production of legumes such as beans, peas and lentils as well as cover crops – all of which are effective at removing nitrogen from the atmosphere and storing it in soils, making it available for subsequent crops. 

Sharing expertise 

The research, published in the Nature journal Communications Earth & Environment, involved scientists at UKCEH as well as Odesa National I.I. Mechnikov University (ONU) in Ukraine and Wageningen University & Research (WUR) in the Netherlands.  

They used official statistics for fertiliser use and yields to estimate the balance of nutrients relating to the production of three key exported crops – wheat, maize and sunflower – in each region of Ukraine over the past 40 years. Together, the production of these three crops cover two-thirds of the country’s agricultural land. 

Ukraine became one of the world’s major crop-exporting countries after independence, being the top global producer and exporter of sunflower meal, oil and seed, and among the top five maize and wheat exporters. But the war has reduced nutrient inputs, compromising long-term sustainability. 

Study coauthor Professor Mark Sutton of UKCEH said: “We are optimistic that sharing expertise on nutrient management is another way in which the UK and other countries can support Ukraine’s environment and economy at the same time.” 

Promoting greater efficiency 

There has been a separation of arable and livestock agriculture in Ukraine in recent decades, so many farms no longer have easy access to animal manure to spread on to fields as a fertiliser. The number of livestock has fallen significantly but the study says 90% of the manure that is still produced is wasted – the equivalent of US $2.2 billion in fertiliser costs. 

The authors therefore advocate more mixed farming and localised sustainable management of manure. They say farmers in Ukraine need information to persuade them of the economic and environmental benefits of taking action. 

Many of the report’s recommendations require little investment, meaning that, with community efforts, the shift towards more sustainable agriculture in Ukraine could start now, while the war continues. This would result in lower costs for farmers, maintained productivity and less impact on the environment. 

Suggested measures include setting up local systems to collect surplus manure and redistribute it to other farms, using more efficient types of fertiliser and sharing knowledge from the Ukrainian farms already implementing more sustainable practices. 

The report also calls for a national inventory of how much nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium that different crop variants remove from the soil – a key step towards an ’smart fertiliser planner’, a software tool that would help farmers apply exactly what their crops need.  

The authors say farmers also need financial support from their government and the international community, including through the Ukraine Recovery and Reconstruction Fund, to improve sustainable nutrient management. This would include helping them to buy machinery that applies synthetic and organic fertilisers to land more efficiently, and to build facilities to handle, store and treat manure. 

From excess to deficiency 

The scientists report that when Ukraine was part of the Soviet Union, there was over-use of fertilisers, resulting in excess nutrients in soils and environmental pollution. However, they conclude the opposite extreme now exists – insufficient amounts of the three key crop nutrients in agricultural soils. 

Following Ukraine’s independence, the use of synthetic phosphorus and potassium, most of which are imported, fell sharply and there have been insufficient amounts in soils across most of the country for the past 30 years, exacerbated by the war. 

In contrast, the use of synthetic nitrogen fertiliser, which also initially declined in the 1990s, began to rise again – partly supported by domestic production. This later led to over-application in many areas. By 2021, Ukraine’s rate of application of nitrogen fertiliser (per hectare), was among the highest in the world, but the war has resulted in usage falling significantly. 

- Ends -  

Media enquiries 

For an interview with a scientist or further information, please contact Simon Williams, Media Relations Officer at UKCEH, via simwil@ceh.ac.uk or +44 (0)7920 295384. 

Notes to Editors 

Study information 

Medinets et al. 2025. Nutrient asymmetry challenges the sustainability of Ukrainian agriculture. journal Communications Earth & Environment. DOI: 10.1038/s43247-025-02826-9. Open access. The study was part of the International Nitrogen Assessment, which has carried out studies on major nutrient threats, opportunities and solutions in different regions across the world.  

The assessment, which is being compiled by 350 experts, is due to be published next year. It is funded by the UN Environment Programme (UNEP) with support from the Global Environment Facility (GEF). 

About nutrients 

*Nitrogen is vital for plant growth. Phosphorus is essential for development of a healthy and deep root system, which is crucial for absorbing nutrients and water, and supports production of seeds and flowers. Potassium has similar benefits to phosphorus, as well as making plants more resilient to stresses including drought. 

**However, loss of nutrients to the environment leads to air and water pollution: 

  • Excess nitrogen and phosphorus from chemical fertilisers and manure can leach into soils and ultimately rivers, contributing to the formation of harmful algal blooms. 

  • Nitrogen-based gases such as ammonia (NH3) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) are key components of particulate matter, thereby contributing to poor air quality which can aggravate respiratory and heart conditions, leading to premature deaths, as well as adverse effects on natural ecosystems. 

  • Nitrous oxide (N2O) is a greenhouse gas that depletes the ozone layer and is 260 times more powerful than carbon dioxide. 

About the UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) 

The UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology (UKCEH) is a leading independent research institute dedicated to understanding and transforming how we interact with the natural world. 

With over 600 researchers, we tackle the urgent environmental challenges of our time, such as climate change and biodiversity loss. Our evidence-based insights empower governments, businesses, and communities to make informed decisions, shaping a future where both nature and people thrive. 

www.ceh.ac.uk / ukceh.bsky.social  / LinkedIn: UK Centre for Ecology & Hydrology