Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Voltinism and resilience to climate-induced phenological mismatch

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Changes in the seasonal timing of recurring biological events are considered to be a major component of the global “fingerprint” of climate change. One effect of these changes is that ecologically important seasonal species interactions could become desynchronised as a result of these shifts (i.e. phenological mismatching), leading to reductions in fitness for some or all of the organisms concerned. One important, but unresolved, issue is the extent to which variations in voltinism (the number of generations a population of a species produces per year) may serve to exacerbate, or confer resilience to, the effects of seasonal shifts. Univoltine organisms (those with one generation per year) will always suffer the deleterious consequences of phenological mismatch, whereas multivoltine species are likely to experience at least some relief from these negative effects in generations that occur later in the season. Conversely, univoltine species will experience continual selection to adapt to changing seasonality, whereas multivoltine species will experience reduced or no selection during those generations that occur later in the season. Here, we present a new theoretical model to explore the population consequences of scenarios of changing seasonality and varying voltinism in clonal species. We find that organisms that undergo multiple generations per year show greater resilience to phenological mismatching in the spring and adapt better to changing seasonality, because of the recovery of population size and genetic diversity after each spring mismatching event. These results have clear implications for management and conservation of populations that are threatened by the effects of mismatch.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Altermatt F (2010) Climatic warming increases voltinism in European butterflies and moths. Proc Biol Sci 277:1281–1287. doi:10.1098/rspb.2009.1910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baer CF, Miyamoto MM, Denver DR (2007) Mutation rate variation in multicellular eukaryotes: causes and consequences. Nat Rev Genet 8:619–631. doi:10.1038/nrg2158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bromham L (2011) The genome as a life-history character: why rate of molecular evolution varies between mammal species. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser B Biol Sci 366:2503–2513. doi:10.1098/rstb.2011.0014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burger R, Lynch M (1995) Evolution and extinction in a changing environment: a quantitative-genetic analysis. Evolution 49:151–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevin L-M, Lande R, Mace GM (2010) Adaptation, plasticity, and extinction in a changing environment: towards a predictive theory. PLoS Biol 8:e1000357. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1000357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Core Team R (2013) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria

    Google Scholar 

  • Cushing DH (1990) Plankton production and year class strength in fish populations - an update of the match mismatch hypothesis. Adv Mar Biol 26:249–293

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duputié A, Rutschmann A, Ronce O, Chuine I (2015) Phenological plasticity will not help all species adapt to climate change. Glob Change Biol 21:3062–3073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2014) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. In: Field CB, Barros VR, Dokken DJ, Mach KJ (eds) Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Knaus J (2013) Snowfall https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/snowfall/index.html

  • Lanfear R, Kokko H, Eyre-Walker A (2014) Population size and the rate of evolution. Trends Ecol Evol 29:33–41. doi:10.1016/j.tree.2013.09.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch M, Lande R (1993) Evolution and extinction in response to environmental-change. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller-Rushing AJ, Høye TT, Inouye DW, Post E (2010) The effects of phenological mismatches on demography. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 365:3177–3186. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0148

  • Moya-Laraño J, Rowntree J, Woodward G (eds) (2014) Eco-evolutionary dynamics. Academic Press Inc

  • Ohlberger J, Thackeray S, Winfield I, et al. (2014) When phenology matters: age–size truncation alters population response to trophic mismatch. Proc R Soc B-Biol Sci 281:20140938. doi:10.1098/rspb.2014.0938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parmesan C, Yohe G (2003) A globally coherent fingerprint of climate change impacts across natural systems. Nature 421:37–42. doi:10.1038/nature01286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillimore AB, Hadfield JD, Jones OR, Smithers RJ (2010) Differences in spawning date between populations of common frog reveal local adaptation. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:8292–8297. doi:10.1073/pnas.0913792107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed TE, Grøtan V, Jenouvrier S, et al. (2013a) Population growth in a wild bird is buffered against phenological mismatch. Science 340:488–491. doi:10.1126/science.1232870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed TE, Jenouvrier S, Visser ME (2013b) Phenological mismatch strongly affects individual fitness but not population demography in a woodland passerine. J Anim Ecol 82:131–144. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2012.02020.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Root TL, Price JT, Hall KR, et al. (2003) Fingerprints of global warming on wild animals and plants. Nature 421:57–60. doi:10.1038/nature01333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thackeray SJ, Sparks TH, Frederiksen M, et al. (2010) Trophic level asynchrony in rates of phenological change for marine, freshwater and terrestrial environments. Glob Change Biol 16:3304–3313. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2010.02165.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas JA, Welch JJ, Lanfear R, Bromham L (2010) A generation time effect on the rate of molecular evolution in invertebrates. Mol Biol Evol msq009. doi: 10.1093/molbev/msq009

  • Visser ME (2008) Keeping up with a warming world; assessing the rate of adaptation to climate change. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:649–659. doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Visser ME, Both C (2005) Shifts in phenology due to global climate change: the need for a yardstick. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B-Biol Sci 272:2561–2569. doi:10.1098/rspb.2005.3356

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to Aris Moustakas and Matthew Evans for helpful comments on a previous version of the manuscript, and we are grateful to two anonymous reviewers for their helpful and constructive criticisms of an earlier draft. SJT was supported by NERC grant NE/J02080X/1 (“Quantifying links between human influences on climate, shifting seasons and widespread ecosystem consequences”).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert J. Knell.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(R 294 kb)

ESM 2

(HTML 4972 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Knell, R.J., Thackeray, S.J. Voltinism and resilience to climate-induced phenological mismatch. Climatic Change 137, 525–539 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1691-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1691-4

Keywords

Navigation