Elsevier

Ecosystem Services

Volume 18, April 2016, Pages 110-117
Ecosystem Services

Do ecosystem service maps and models meet stakeholders’ needs? A preliminary survey across sub-Saharan Africa

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2016.02.038Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Highlights

  • Only 27% of stakeholders surveyed have sufficient ecosystem services (ES) data.

  • Most stakeholders surveyed focus on provisioning and regulating ES.

  • Cultural ES are often neglected in decision-making due to data deficiency.

  • There is a high demand for ES data at multiple points in time.

  • All surveyed technical experts agree that ES models must enable scenarios to be run.

Abstract

To achieve sustainability goals, it is important to incorporate ecosystem service (ES) information into decision-making processes. However, little is known about the correspondence between the needs of ES information users and the data provided by the researcher community. We surveyed stakeholders within sub-Saharan Africa, determining their ES data requirements using a targeted sampling strategy. Of those respondents utilising ES information (>90%; n=60), 27% report having sufficient data; with the remainder requiring additional data – particularly at higher spatial resolutions and at multiple points in time. The majority of respondents focus on provisioning and regulating services, particularly food and fresh water supply (both 58%) and climate regulation (49%). Their focus is generally at national scales or below and in accordance with data availability. Among the stakeholders surveyed, we performed a follow-up assessment for a sub-sample of 17 technical experts. The technical experts are unanimous that ES models must be able to incorporate scenarios, and most agree that ES models should be at least 90% accurate. However, relatively coarse-resolution (1–10 km2) models are sufficient for many services. To maximise the impact of future research, dynamic, multi-scale datasets on ES must be delivered alongside capacity-building efforts.

Keywords

Africa
Decision-maker
Ecosystem service
Policy-maker
Science-policy interface

Cited by (0)