Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Catchment productivity controls CO2 emissions from lakes

Abstract

Most lakes are oversaturated with CO2 and are net CO2 sources to the atmosphere, yet their contribution to the global carbon cycle is poorly constrained1,2,3,4. Their CO2 excess is widely attributed to in-lake oxidation of terrestrially produced dissolved organic carbon5. Here we use data collected over 26 years to show that the CO2 in 20 lakes is primarily delivered directly through inflowing streams rather than being produced in situ by degradation of terrestrial carbon. This implies that high CO2 concentrations and atmospheric emissions are not necessarily symptoms of heterotrophic lake ecosystems. Instead, the annual mean CO2 concentration increased with lake productivity and was proportional to the estimated net primary productivity of the catchment. Overall, about 1.6% of net primary productivity (range 1.2–2.2%) was lost to the atmosphere. Extrapolating globally, this is equivalent to CO2 losses of 0.9 Pg C yr−1 (range 0.7–1.3), consistent with existing estimates. These data and our catchment productivity hypothesis re-enforce the high connectivity found between lakes, their catchment and the global C cycle6. They indicate that future concentrations of CO2 in lakes, and losses to the atmosphere, will be highly sensitive to altered catchment management and concomitant effects of climate change that modify catchment productivity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Figure 1: Effect of lake productivity on concentration of CO2.
Figure 2: Relationship between inorganic and organic δ13C values in lakes and streams and productivity and CO2 concentration.
Figure 3: Links between lake CO2 concentration, CO2 efflux and catchment productivity.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cole, J. J., Caraco, N. F., Kling, G. W. & Kratz, T. K. Carbon dioxide supersaturation in the surface waters of lakes. Science 265, 1568–1570 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Maberly, S. C. Diel, episodic and seasonal changes in pH and concentrations of inorganic carbon in a productive lake. Freshwat. Biol. 35, 579–598 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sobek, S., Tranvik, L. J. & Cole, J. J. Temperature independence of carbon dioxide supersaturation in global lakes. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 19, GB2003 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tranvik, L. J. et al. Lakes and reservoirs as regulators of carbon cycling and climate. Limnol. Oceanogr. 54, 2298–2314 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Duarte, C. M. & Prairie, Y. T. Prevalence of heterotrophy and atmospheric CO2 emissions from aquatic ecosystems. Ecosystems 8, 862–870 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cole, J. J. et al. Plumbing the global carbon cycle: Integrating inland waters into the terrestrial carbon budget. Ecosystems 10, 171–184 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Bastviken, D., Tranvik, L. J., Downing, J. A., Crill, P. M. & Enrich-Prast, A. Freshwater methane emissions offset the continental carbon sink. Science 331, 50 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Tipping, E., Hilton, J. & James, B. Dissolved organic-matter in Cumbrian lakes and streams. Freshwat. Biol. 19, 371–378 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kadiri, M. O. & Reynolds, C. S. Long-term monitoring of the conditions of lakes: The example of the English Lake District. Arch. Hydrobiol. 129, 157–178 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vighi, M. & Chiaudani, G. A simple method to estimate lake phosphorus concentrations resulting from natural, background, loadings. Water Res. 19, 987–991 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kortelainen, P. et al. Sediment respiration and lake trophic state are important predictors of large CO2 evasion from small boreal lakes. Glob. Change Biol. 12, 1554–1567 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Striegl, R. G. et al. Carbon dioxide partial pressure and 13C content of north temperate and boreal lakes at spring ice melt. Limnol. Oceanogr. 46, 941–945 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. DelGiorgio, P. A., Cole, J. J. & Cimbleris, A. Respiration rates in bacteria exceed phytoplankton production in unproductive aquatic systems. Nature 385, 148–151 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Neal, C., House, W. A., Jarvie, H. P. & Eatherall, A. The significance of dissolved carbon dioxide in major lowland rivers entering the North Sea. Sci. Total Environ. 210, 187–203 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cole, J. J. & Caraco, N. F. Carbon in catchments: Connecting terrestrial carbon losses with aquatic metabolism. Marine Freshwat. Res. 52, 101–110 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Butman, D. & Raymond, P. A. Significant efflux of carbon dioxide from streams and rivers in the United States. Nature Geosci. 4, 839–842 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Stets, E. G., Striegl, R. G., Aiken, G. R., Rosenberry, D. O. & Winter, T. C. Hydrologic support of carbon dioxide flux revealed by whole-lake carbon budget. J. Geophys. Res. 114, G01008 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Finlay, K., Leavitt, P., Patoine, A. & Wissel, B. Magnitude and controls of organic and inorganic carbon flux through a chain of hard-water lakes on the northern Great Plains. Limnol. Oceanogr. 55, 1551–1564 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Maberly, S. C. Photosynthesis by Fontinalis antipyretica: I. Interaction between photon irradiance, concentration of carbon dioxide and temperature. New Phytol. 100, 127–140 (1985).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Seekell, D. A. & Pace, M. L. Does the Pareto distribution adequately describe the size-distribution of lakes? Limnol. Oceanogr. 56, 350–356 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Field, C. B., Behrenfeld, M. J., Randerson, J. T. & Falkowski, P. Primary production of the biosphere: Integrating terrestrial and oceanic components. Science 281, 237–240 (1998).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Hsu, J. S., Powell, J. & Adler, P. B. Sensitivity of mean annual primary production to precipitation. Glob. Change Biol. 18, 2246–2255 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Raich, J. W. & Schlesinger, W. H. The global carbon dioxide flux in soil respiration and its relationship to vegetation and climate. Tellus Ser. B 44, 81–99 (1992).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sobek, S., Tranvik, L. J., Prairie, Y. T., Kortelainen, P. & Cole, J. J. Patterns and regulation of dissolved organic carbon: An analysis of 7,500 widely distributed lakes. Limnol. Oceanogr. 52, 1208–1219 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Kosten, S. et al. Climate-dependent CO2 emissions from lakes. Global Biogeochem. Cycles 24, GB2007 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Arneth, A. et al. Terrestrial biogeochemical feedbacks in the climate system. Nature Geosci. 3, 525–532 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Mackereth, F. J. H., Heron, J. & Talling, J. F. Water Analysis: Some Revised Methods for Limnologists Vol. 36 (Titus Wilson, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tipping, E. Cation Binding by Humic Substances (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2002).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  29. Waldron, S., Scott, E. M. & Soulsby, C. Stable isotope analysis reveals lower-order river dissolved inorganic carbon pools are highly dynamic. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41, 6156–6162 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Fuller, R. M. et al. The UK land cover map 2000: Planning, construction and calibration of a remotely sensed, user-oriented map of broad habitats. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 7, 202–216 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

D. Sleep carried out the 13C analysis on the aquatic bryophytes, L. King and S. Fielding collected and cleaned the diatom samples and J. Grey provided access to the mass spectrometers at Plön. We thank R. Bardgett, J. Cole, R. Milne, S. Sobek, E. Tipping and S. Waldron for advice. The Freshwater Biological Association provided the data from 1984. The Environment Agency funded the routine sampling of the lakes in 1991, 1995, 2000 and 2005.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

S.C.M. conceived the work, led the analysis and co-wrote the manuscript. P.A.B. undertook the diatom isotope work and analysis and co-wrote the manuscript. A.W.S. undertook the remainder of the isotope measurements. M.M.D.V. led the field work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen C. Maberly.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing financial interests.

Supplementary information

Supplementary Information

Supplementary Information (PDF 404 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maberly, S., Barker, P., Stott, A. et al. Catchment productivity controls CO2 emissions from lakes. Nature Clim Change 3, 391–394 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1748

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1748

This article is cited by

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing Microbiology

Sign up for the Nature Briefing: Microbiology newsletter — what matters in microbiology research, free to your inbox weekly.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing: Microbiology